Cape Town, May 30 (IANS) India’s steady stewardship during the recent BRICS Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in New Delhi offers a compelling model for how nations should respond in an era defined by a familiar superpower dynamic.
Amid the evolving geopolitical landscape, great powers such as the US and China maintain direct, high-level diplomatic engagement with one another, often tolerating, encouraging or even fueling conflicts and rivalries among smaller and middle powers.
Rather than retreating in frustration or seeking premature unity, India’s approach is one of pragmatic realism —“Remain constructively engaged in the forum, skillfully manage the resulting contradictions and crises, extract whatever practical gains are realistically available, and maintain the clear-eyed discipline not to pretend that the bloc can yet speak with one coherent voice on volatile security issues,” a report in South African newspaper Independent Online, detailed.
The May 14–15 BRICS meeting, chaired by India, concluded without a joint statement for the first time in the bloc’s history. Instead, a chair's statement and outcome document were released, acknowledging “differing views among some members”, amid sharp divisions between Iran and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) that made consensus impossible.
As the deadlock unfolded in New Delhi, China’s top leadership was simultaneously engaged with the US in Beijing, while the Chinese Foreign Minister remained absent from the BRICS meeting to host the US delegation.
“This left India to manage the fallout of a predictable regional crisis within BRICS, one that followed the 2024 expansion strongly championed by China, which admitted both Iran and the UAE as full members despite their longstanding rivalries and Iran’s conflicts with most Arab League states,” the report highlighted.
It noted that the 2024 expansion had largely served “Beijing’s strategic calculus” more than the “collective cohesion of the group". The report added that Iran’s entry in the grouping, despite its long-running proxy conflicts with most Arab League states and the new Gulf members, was a “calculated risk that prioritised Chinese leverage over bloc harmony".
The report observed that, while BRICS grappled with internal divisions partly introduced by China, Beijing continued to keep channels open with US President Donald Trump, underscoring its “superpower” tendency to compartmentalise relationships.
“The parallel events underscored a consistent pattern: China advanced its broader geopolitical architecture on its own terms, even when the resulting frictions left the rest of BRICS preoccupied with infighting rather than projecting unified Global-South leadership,” it noted.
--IANS
scor/ksk/as
